A controversial bill relating to asbestos, and more specifically, to mesothelioma and compensation claims, has failed to move forward following a majority vote against its introduction.
The bill was largely opposed by victims and support groups for a number of reasons, not least because it appeared to be offering asbestos companies a way out of bankruptcy and financial ruin by placing a ceiling limit on payouts to mesothelioma victims and their families.
US Senator Patty Murray, who was one of those that opposed the bill, stated in a speech that the bill failed victims in a number of ways:
- The awards were too small
- The trust fund was inadequate
- It failed to educate Americans about the dangers of asbestos
- It fell short on research, tracking and treatment for asbestos related diseases
- It put unfair burdens on family members of the victims
- It allowed insurance companies to reduce the amount awarded to victims
Another 49 agreed with Murray, and the bill failed on a 50-47 vote in April 2004. Murray also added that, having worked for three years with mesothelioma victims, she could not possibly have backed the bill.

